Sunday, 2 May 2010

liberal interventionism

we know what that is, don't we people?  Norm says he is voting Labour, and this is one of the reasons he gives:

Labour is the party most closely associated with the doctrine of liberal interventionism, a doctrine which should be supported.

Hallelujah.  Yes they are and yes it should.  The alternative is - democracy, human rights and the rule of law just for white folks who read the Guardian, which is an obscenity.  So, if you are minded to vote Tory on Thursday, ask your candidate what they think about liberal interventionism.  How would they have voted on Iraq for example if they had been in the House in 2003, or how did they vote if they were.  Expect them to tell you the truth, and hold them to it.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I feel the same. I cannot understand why the Labour leadership has not made the case for liberal interventionism and exposed the Lib Dems' (including the 2 Reading candidates) support for terrorists.