Tuesday, 30 June 2009

a question worth asking

should BNP members be allowed to work in the public sector? They already are not if they are police officers or prison officers. But teachers? Nurses? Civil servants? Benefit officers? Nick Cohen has a good piece on this here, published in the Observer on Sunday 28th June. I will answer the question myself. Yes. Including if they are police officers or prison officers. Because the BNP is a legally constituted political party. If its members are to be discriminated against in terms of employment then the next step is to make membership of the BNP illegal. And what does that mean for those who have been elected as BNP councillors, MEPs, maybe even an MP at the next election? And worse than that (those who are elected for the BNP have a sorry record of getting disqualified for violent behaviour, benefit fraud and so on) do we really want to have in Britain tribunals saying "Are you now or have you ever been"?

Pride is often expressed in the tolerance and fairness of British society. That way can lie complacency, it is true. But wasn't it right for Britain to shelter American film directors and others who could no longer work in the US because they were or had been communists, or were thought to have been? Remember that even in those times there was a US Communist Party (I think it still exists today) and you did not go to prison for being a member of it. And if it was right then why is it also right today to deny employment to people on the grounds of their political beliefs?

Here in France holocaust denial is a crime, which it is not in the UK. The comedian Dieudonne, who has expressed such views and has publicly supported the Front National, is not however banned from working (though I have never seen him on mainstream TV, perhaps I am watching the wrong channels). Dieudonne is black. So it all starts getting complicated. Let's have laws against incitement to racial hatred, and let's have public servants dismissed if they break them. Let's not allow teachers to indoctrinate their pupils politically (it happened all the time when I was going to school). Let's make the BNP comply with UK laws by not restricting membership to whites (there is all kinds of nonsense on their website about the Norse Folk, you have to go to Iceland to find them chaps these days), which the Front National has to do here.

My sister had a teacher at primary school who was a Jehovah's Witness and who terrified some of the children with her proselytising. I submit that teacher should have been disciplined, instructed never to express their own religious views in class again, and allowed to continue working - if they did not comply then they should have been dismissed. In fact what happened back then (the 1960s) is that sympathetic noises were made to worried parents, the possibly traumatised children were ignored or not believed, and the teacher carried on working. But I still think that banning Jehovah's Witnesses from working in schools would be wrong.

Where are the old certainties? Give me Stalin and St Paul, as the man once sang - go on tell, me who sang that.

7 comments:

Jonny said...

St Leonard of Cohen!
Give me back the Berlin Wall
Give me Stalin and St Paul
I've seen the future, brother
And it's murder

Anonymous said...

A propos of not very much, may I point out that it is incorrect to refer to the BNP as Fascists? There is no evidence whatsoever that they would get the trains to run on time....

Anonymous said...

There should be no restrictions whatsoever on BNP members working wherever they choose,BNP is a perfectly legal political party,who almost one million voters recently supported,in case anybody missed it - like it or not BNP is here to stay,and everyone had better just get used to it.

The latest ludicrous wheeze by Brown is Social Housing for 'local' people - perfectly sensible many would say,but I suspect he means Immigrants who've been here at least six months!

JJones said...

The following website summarizes 900 court cases and lawsuits affecting children of Jehovah's Witness Parents, including how JWs rear their children and live day-to-day, PLUS nearly 400 CRIMINAL cases -- most involving MURDERS:

DIVORCE, BLOOD TRANSFUSIONS, AND OTHER LEGAL ISSUES AFFECTING CHILDREN OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES

http://jwdivorces.bravehost.com


The following website summarizes over 500 lawsuits filed by Jehovah's Witnesses against their Employers, incidents involving problem JW Employees, and other secret JW "history" court cases:

EMPLOYMENT ISSUES UNIQUE TO JEHOVAH'S WITNESS EMPLOYEES

http://jwemployees.bravehost.com

jane said...

in fact the next two lines are "Give me Christ or give me Hiroshima" Jonny.

Anon 1229 I have not referred to the BNP as fascists, I think it is a lazy word to use - most of the time

and the BNP troll and JJones re the Jehovah's Witnesses - I've let you both through to show what is out there, but you two are the only ones of your sort

Anonymous said...

I wasn't accusing you, Jane, Cub's honour! It's just that some people (not you!) tend to regard BNP, Fascist and Nazi as interchangeable.

Anonymous said...

An interesting diversionary tactic to avoid discussing the dire quality of teaching in many state schools.