Sunday, 24 January 2010

extreme porn

which of course is illegal now. Well, it is not quite as simple as that I think you will find. We will leave aside the sickening ambulance-chasing engaged in by Mr Martin Salter, who saw, and I still would have difficulty in believing anyone could do this if I had not witnessed it myself, an advantage to himself in promoting the deselection of a neighbouring Labour MP (me) by pursuing the mother of a woman who had been murdered. Yes, we will leave the Liz Longhurst issue aside, and I encourage you to read what is posted under this link on the Backlash site, because it is largely factual, so do read it and try to decide what you think.

Yes, disgusting porn websites must be stopped. Because they are the worst thing in the world. So women are stoned to death in quite a lot of places in the world because of Teh Internetz? I think not. Oh sorry those are not white girls, silly old me. And do you think if people really were inspired to murder by their viewing of "extreme porn" websites (and there is no evidence that anyone ever has been) then they would not view those sites if they thought there would be legal penalties for doing so if they were caught? Given that the legal penalties for, er, murder, if you are caught, are actually quite severe? And that people did actually murder other people before Teh Internetz existed?

No. Just no.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

"illegal to possess an extreme image"
Have they defined 'possess'?
L9

Anonymous said...

Does shooting pheasants count as extreme porn, or do you have to have sex with them as well? Reminds me of the goat on the allotment.

jane said...

not defined as far as I can tell. If it can be shown that you have viewed but not downloaded you might get away with it.

Anonymous said...

It is important, because untli I tightened up the filtering on my pc I was getting completely uninvited inmages, but I presume that 'they' would know the sort of person they were looking for.
L9

Anonymous said...

But what about the people involved in the production/distribution of violent porn?Are they not damaged/damaging people of the type you would not invite home for tea and scones..?