fnarr fnarr etc etc. @pennyred, who is a posh girl called Laura I believe, is to be congratulated for trying to get it right on Assange. Unlike the middle-aged and elderly males of the "international left" (and George Galloway), who have come out in their droves to say that Assange is a hero and that he should therefore not stand to account for the rape he has been accused of, she has tried to say that no-one should have to choose between freedom of speech and respect for women. Good for her. It's only shocking that so many appear to believe, without evidence or due process, that Assange must not stand trial in Sweden. What message does that send, especially to men on the left? Laura quotes teenage boys in her piece who say that they do not think what Assange is reported to have done was rape. What is going to happen in teenage bedrooms, cars and the car parks of night clubs as a result of this? Does anyone care? Well, Laura seems to, and I am pleased about that. Read on in her piece in the Independent (link higher up) and you will see that she says "I believe women". Well, I don't. We tell lies. We shouldn't, but we do. All humans do from time to time, although we try not to. Always believing women who accuse men of rape ruins the lives of innocent men, and those of their families and people who love them. Never believing them, which is what the elderly male left are telling us to do, creates a world in which women become pieces of property. Which is obscene. Laura is tying herself in knots here, but she doesn't need to. Believing in freedom of speech, and believing that women have the right to the integrity of their own bodies, are not mutually contradictory beliefs. And Laura is straying on to territory in which that is how they are seen. And then she spoils herself by saying this:
The answer is, of course, that Julian Assange should be held to account, of course he should, and he should be held to account in a system where due process means something and women are respected, and currently that system does not exist. Come back to me when the 19,000 annual sex attacks committed by members of the US Army and private contractors against their fellow soldiers are prosecuted. Come back to me when Private Bradley Manning is free.
he should be held to account in a system where due process means something and women are respected, and currently that system does not exist Er, yes it does, Laura, in quite a number of places in the world, and one of them is Sweden.
Come back to me when the 19,000 annual sex attacks committed by members of the US Army and private contractors against their fellow soldiers are prosecuted. Why? Rape and sexual assault happen all over the world, all the time. They're not worse when committed by the US military. I would argue that they are worse when committed, say, against girls in Afghanistan who then have the "choice" of marrying their rapist or being killed by their family.
Come back to me when Private Bradley Manning is free. Why? He shouldn't be released, not now. He is to be charged with very serious offences against national security. What he should have is due process, and the US government, and President Obama, should hang their heads in shame that he has not had it. They have other things to hang their heads in shame about too, not least failing to intervene in Syria, but that is for another post.
So, Laura, a good try, and your heart seems to be in the right place, but don't spoil it with meaningless anti-Americanism. Intellectual honesty is not that hard to achieve, if you only try.
"You talk a load of crap, carrot top" (Anonymous) "consistently good and sometimes bonkers!" (Tony Jones) "You obviously pi$$ people off a lot" "One Dangerous Lady" (Anonymous) "Clearly a very unpleasant person" (Grace Nicholas, Cornwall)
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Showing posts with label military. Show all posts
Wednesday, 22 August 2012
Monday, 9 July 2012
the uninvited guest
there was a bit of a do in Reading a few days ago, for soldiers returning from Afghanistan. A Homecoming Parade, held at Brock Barracks. Very dignified and fitting it was too, I am told by some who were there. Many dignitaries, the Mayor of Reading in pride of position, but many other mayors and important people in the VIP enclosure. And a very good thing too, say I. I do not believe councillors were invited qua councillors unless they had a particular connection to the military. But what's this? A swish car hums to a halt, and out leaps Derek Plews, former spinner for the military, and now Head of Communications at Reading Borough Council. The charming Mrs Plews is at his side! They hustle their way into the VIP enclosure, prompting some of the more elderly be-chained dignitaries to ask each other, "Who is this bespectacled northern oik?" The more tuned-in of the dignitaries spot the hunched figure being smuggled in between the two Plews (singly would they each be a Plew?) out of lens-reach of the snapping paparazzi, and once in the enclosure that figure draws itself up to its full height, shakes out its poodle perm in the watery sunlight, and commences a rousing discourse, the returning heroes forgotten. Yes! Councillor Josephine Lovelock is amongst us! Three soldiers faint, but the speech continues. A veil must, from charity, be drawn over what follows.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)