tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post2772200455596370161..comments2024-02-15T17:04:14.226+01:00Comments on Jane Is The One: was this a good idea?janestheonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17617250693471034197noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-56755433506179285122010-09-18T14:21:04.993+02:002010-09-18T14:21:04.993+02:00Who is 'the typical reader of Jane's blog&...Who is 'the typical reader of Jane's blog'?!!<br /><br />Come on Jane! Start a competition! What would he or she be like?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-84954786932879592412010-09-17T14:56:48.419+02:002010-09-17T14:56:48.419+02:00Charming!
Jane and anonymous 16.09 - I don't ...Charming!<br /><br />Jane and anonymous 16.09 - I don't know if you missed my point, but what I said was that I'd seen the Aussie website story before seeing Jane's blogpost, so I didn't write a story on the basis of that at all. <br /><br />I commented merely because I wanted to disabuse Jane of the notion that a) she was the only one who spotted it, b) that we did a story because Mr Salter told us to, or c) we did a story because we were copying her. None are true.<br /><br />Sub-editors are a good idea; I'll never disagree with that!<br /><br />On the point about news value - this wasn't the front page or even a page lead, but a couple of sentences tucked away somewhere. I thought it vaguely interesting that despite his 'political retirement', Mr Salter couldn't drag himself away, and thought some others might too. It obviously wasn't aimed at the typical reader of Jane's blog!<br /><br />On why a google alert - why not? When Mr Salter was MP, it was occasionally useful to know if he'd made comments to some more obscure news outlet that may be worth chasing up. As I said originally, I simply hadn't cancelled it. <br /><br />Adam HewittAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-43973110970453902572010-09-16T16:09:20.689+02:002010-09-16T16:09:20.689+02:00I think you should write 'Adam' a charming...I think you should write 'Adam' a charming reply with a sweet postcript - and my fee for providing you with this story is?<br /><br />Fill in the noughts.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-65522728202000416272010-09-16T15:26:36.702+02:002010-09-16T15:26:36.702+02:00clearly so - and why the Google alert? and why de...clearly so - and why the Google alert? and why decide to write a story on the basis of my blog post? makes you wonder.janestheonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17617250693471034197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-13384480954262236412010-09-16T13:55:20.199+02:002010-09-16T13:55:20.199+02:00Whatever is the point? Is The Chronicle so bereft ...Whatever is the point? Is The Chronicle so bereft of news that it has to fill up space with some no-mark's holiday postcards?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-63357473192843625182010-09-16T12:42:08.008+02:002010-09-16T12:42:08.008+02:00From this, we can conclude that sub-editors are a ...From this, we can conclude that sub-editors are a rather good idea.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com