tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post1644631141838822549..comments2024-02-15T17:04:14.226+01:00Comments on Jane Is The One: Congratulations, Reading Evening Post!janestheonehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17617250693471034197noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-85448283157303923422012-01-16T16:13:12.843+01:002012-01-16T16:13:12.843+01:00I understood that the official Labour Party cand...I understood that the official Labour Party candidate for the Reading East seat in the 2005 General Election had a previous conviction for cottaging in a public convenience. I do not come from Readign, but read about this matter in The Daily Mail at the time. <br />If thsi is not the case, we need to know. And if it is untrue, then why did the person in question not sue? If it is the case, then it is a statement of fact - there is nothing homophobic in stating a fact. If we say that stating a fact is homophobic in itself, then we would have to be totally silent about Oscar Wilde's convictions. This is logic, not homophobia.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-49058342460512382922012-01-16T16:01:30.037+01:002012-01-16T16:01:30.037+01:00No.No.janestheonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17617250693471034197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-4431605664555620382012-01-16T13:25:34.937+01:002012-01-16T13:25:34.937+01:00more homophobic nonsense please removemore homophobic nonsense please removeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-62299199826453427562012-01-16T10:36:30.752+01:002012-01-16T10:36:30.752+01:00I was referring to the spent cottaging conviction....I was referring to the spent cottaging conviction. It appeared in all the newspapers with a refrence to Coronation StreetAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-81375239723527458032012-01-15T11:39:51.812+01:002012-01-15T11:39:51.812+01:00Anon 1800.
A bit pedantic perhaps, but can one be ...Anon 1800.<br />A bit pedantic perhaps, but can one be an EX sex-offender?<br />L9.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-844683806110757652012-01-14T18:00:21.234+01:002012-01-14T18:00:21.234+01:00I think Martin Salter is the disgraced MP - or ex ...I think Martin Salter is the disgraced MP - or ex MP - for getting rid of a Labour colleague and neighbour who increased her majority; attempting to foist an ex sex offender on Westminster; not to mention the business of the MP expenses .<br /><br />Didn't the guy cop off with £40,000 buckshee, Jane? Tell that to Cassell.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-36467864338250543052012-01-14T16:13:10.810+01:002012-01-14T16:13:10.810+01:00I haven't read it because I can't find the...I haven't read it because I can't find the link - but I would assume is is anything but knockabotu fun, last Anon. Hey, Mr - because I am sure you ARE a Mr - do you actually know what it feels like to have people writing really horrible, nasty and abusive things about you on a regular basis? Even though the abusers are stupid dick-heads!! It isn't fun, matey - it is sick. And you feel like shit and that is just what the haters whant you to feel like. <br /><br />I bet you'd get pissed off if someone said they were'nt too keen on your shoes, HEIN?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-82847476621976161512012-01-14T10:26:07.647+01:002012-01-14T10:26:07.647+01:00Anonymouse Post Apologist.
No it isn't. It do...Anonymouse Post Apologist.<br /><br />No it isn't. It doesn't play the ball it plays the person. The poor use of language and the ignorance of the history of posts on this blog show the writer of the piece was either ignorant or malevolent.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-49986402473642956782012-01-13T14:18:10.014+01:002012-01-13T14:18:10.014+01:00It's just a bit of knockabout fun.It's just a bit of knockabout fun.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-91809422142333240002012-01-13T13:25:32.570+01:002012-01-13T13:25:32.570+01:00a reader writes in response to Crappy Cassell:
&q...a reader writes in response to Crappy Cassell:<br /><br />"When I read the piece by Paul Cassell I had to laugh. Imagine the degradation, a journalist, that's it a professional journalist from the dead tree media being reduced to commenting on the content of a blog. No wonder he was so vile. Imagine how bad he felt about what he was doing. Such bad faith. Why they had not deigned to acknowledge your existence before. Stories taken from things first published on your blog but no mention of the origin. Sometimes the HMV habit of cut-and-paste resulted in them reading exactly as what was on the blog. But always the blog was ignored. But here he was a so-called professional writer having to write about someone, the writings of someone who is not a journalist, even worse, a bloggerjanestheonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17617250693471034197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-48311945388871895602012-01-13T13:24:17.922+01:002012-01-13T13:24:17.922+01:00The Reading Evening Post is not rubbishing my book...The Reading Evening Post is not rubbishing my book (which they have not read) they are rubbishing ME. And they chose to copy their "story" out of my blog and top and tail it with abuse. Some journalism, hein?<br /><br />L9, if I post about Reading Labour in any critical way then I get three or four abusive comments and usually some violent porn in the hours following the post (usually late evening UK time), otherwise one a fortnight or less. And then not usually porn.janestheonehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17617250693471034197noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-90503215123917606912012-01-13T10:37:19.400+01:002012-01-13T10:37:19.400+01:00So roughly how many comments in a week do you have...So roughly how many comments in a week do you have to delete?<br />L9Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2932765464128103640.post-2000769307341598152012-01-12T09:45:21.665+01:002012-01-12T09:45:21.665+01:00Don't get this. Is The Reading Evening Post r...Don't get this. Is The Reading Evening Post rubbishing your book and also offering you a photocall?<br /><br />Who is Paul Cassell? Is he a journalist? Why should these people assume that you have written about Reading?!!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com